The Right Lawyer for Defense Against Theft Charges
Experienced Raleigh, North Carolina, Theft Charge Defense Lawyer
Roberts Law Group, PLLC, provides aggressive legal representation for juveniles and adults charged with crimes involving theft and stolen property. As a former prosecutor in three different counties in North Carolina, attorney Patrick Roberts has seen nearly every kind of felony and misdemeanor theft case, often in cases involving drug and alcohol addiction. If you or a member of your family has been charged with theft, embezzlement or another stolen property crime, we may be able to find a treatment program as an alternative to a conviction and jail time.
We Do Everything We Can To Reduce Felony Theft Charges to a Misdemeanor
Contact our offices to discuss the circumstances of your theft charge. We will meet at a time and location that is most convenient for you, including the police station. We are compassionate and handle every client with care. At Roberts Law Group, we won't judge you. You have the constitutional right to representation against the criminal charges you face. Our job is to fight aggressively and effectively to help you protect your rights and preserve your freedom. We are proud of the number of times we have helped people avoid jail.
We have a successful record handling theft charge defense cases such as:
- Juvenile theft offenses
- Auto theft
- Fraud, white collar theft
- Cash drawer embezzlement
- Burglary, breaking and entering
- Armed robbery, theft with assault
- ID theft, stolen credit cards, check forgery
If you are facing theft charges, or you are the parent of a student charged with theft, contact us to discuss your defense needs. When experience counts, don't take chances.
North Carolina vs. M.W.
Charge: Charge: Robbery with A Dangerous Weapon (4 Counts), First Degree Burglary, Conspiracy to Commit Robbery with A Dangerous Weapon
Facing: 12 - 17 years in prison
An incarcerated defendant accused our client of participating in the robbery of a group of youth at a party. We were able to raise doubt as to the credibility of this individual. In the end, the prosecutor dismissed these charges, citing a lack of evidence.