North Carolina Armed Robbery Attorney
If you are accused of armed robbery, you are facing a significant prison term and other criminal consequences. Depending on your record, you could be sentenced to more than 20 years in prison for an armed robbery in North Carolina.
A violent theft attorney at the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, can help fight for your rights. With offices in both Wilmington and Raleigh, our criminal attorneys have years of experience helping clients who are facing complicated and serious charges. Contact our law firm or call us toll-free at 866-630-2389 to schedule an appointment.
Turn to Us to Fight an Armed Robbery Charge
We are ready to defend against your armed robbery charge, as well as other violent crime charges, including:
- Aggravated assault
- Domestic violence
- Vehicular homicide and vehicular assault from DWI
- Homicide, including murder and manslaughter
Our firm's founding attorney, Patrick Roberts, is a former Assistant District Attorney in three North Carolina counties. We rely on that experience to help you understand the criminal process and to advocate for you in discussions with the prosecutor. We will fight aggressively to protect your freedom following an armed robbery charge.
Count on Us When It Matters to You
Our North Carolina armed robbery attorneys handle cases throughout North Carolina, including Raleigh, Wilmington, Greensboro and Durham. We can help - Contact our law firm today. To speak to our experienced lawyers, call the firm at 866-630-2389.
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.