DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
Fayetteville Violent Theft Charge Defense
If you have been charged with a violent theft crime in Fayetteville or elsewhere in the state of North Carolina, it is crucial that you speak with an experienced criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible. Any conviction on a violent theft crime, including armed robbery and burglary, can carry significant criminal penalties that include jail time, fines, probation and a permanent mark on your criminal record.
The Roberts Law Group, PLLC, is located in Raleigh, and provides experienced criminal defense for people charged with violent theft crimes in Fayetteville and North Carolina. As a former prosecutor, attorney Patrick Roberts has handled nearly every kind of felony and misdemeanor theft case, including armed robberies and cases involving weapons and drugs. He will work to build an effective defense for your case.
State vs. J.H. - Our client was accused of breaking into a neighbor's home and stealing money. We were able to prove that our client was at home when the break-in occurred. Result: The charges were dismissed. Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases.
Property and Violent Theft Crimes in North Carolina
At the Roberts Law Group, we have defended clients on a wide range of violent theft crimes and other property crimes, including:
- Burglary
- Breaking and entering
- Armed robbery
- Theft with assault
- Auto theft
- Shoplifting
- Juvenile theft offenses
You have the right to a defense inside of a courtroom. Our firm is not afraid to stand up for your rights at trial and to aggressively pursue the results that you deserve.
Read more information in the North Carolina statute § 14-53 about the charge of breaking and entering and the burden of proof that prosecutors must meet in order to secure a conviction.
Experienced Counts After a Violent Theft Arrest
After an arrest for a violent theft crime or other property crime, contact the Roberts Law Group and discuss your case with our firm. Schedule a free initial consultation by calling our Raleigh office toll free at 866-630-2389 to make an appointment.
We also deal with issues involving:
- Military Law
- Court Martial
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
