DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
Goldsboro Violent Theft Crimes Attorney
If you have been arrested and charged with a violent theft crime in Goldsboro or elsewhere in the state of North Carolina, it is important to speak with an experienced lawyer about protecting your rights and your future. Upon conviction of armed robbery or another violent theft crime, you may be facing penalties that can impact the rest of your life, including significant prison time, fines and probation.
Any felony or misdemeanor conviction will also go onto your criminal record. At the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, we provide aggressive and experienced representation for individuals charged with violent theft crimes in Goldsboro and anywhere in the state of North Carolina. Former Assistant District Attorney Patrick Roberts has obtained successful results defending people against a wide range of felony and misdemeanor theft crimes.
State vs. J.H. - Our client was accused of breaking into a neighbor's home and stealing money. We were able to prove that our client was at home when the break-in occurred. Result: The charges were dismissed. Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases.
Experience Counts in Violent Theft Crime Cases
The Roberts Law Group has defended clients on a wide range of violent theft crimes and other property crimes, including:
- Burglary
- Breaking and entering
- Armed robbery
- Theft with assault
- Auto theft
- Shoplifting
- Juvenile theft offenses
Learn more about your right to an experienced criminal defense and what the Roberts Law Group can do to help protect you. When you cannot afford to take chances with your criminal defense, talk with a law firm that can back up their talk with results.(link)
For more information regarding theft crimes, our firm can help explain the statutes in North Carolina outlining burglary and other property crimes. Read more information about 2nd degree burglary in statute § 14-51 that can carry anywhere from 8-47 months in prison.
Armed Robbery and Property Crimes Defense in North Carolina
If you have been arrested for armed robbery or other property crime, contact the Roberts Law Group and talk with us about your case. Schedule a free initial consultation by calling our Raleigh office toll free at 866-630-2389 to make an appointment.
We also deal with issues involving:
- Military Law
- Court Martial
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
