DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
Experienced North Carolina Assault Defense Attorney
Criminal charges for assault and other violent crimes, including domestic violence and homicide, carry the possibility of lengthy prison sentences and other penalties. If you are facing a serious charge of a violent crime, it is important to get the help that you need as soon as possible from an experienced lawyer.
At the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, we are able to defend clients throughout Wilmington and North Carolina who have been charged with violent crimes. Former Assistant District Attorney Patrick Roberts is a trial lawyer with in-depth experience at both defending and prosecuting criminal charges, including allegations of violent crimes.
State vs. J.A. - The State accused our client of stabbing another man and our client confessed his involvement in the altercation. He was facing 24 to 31 years in prison. Result: We were able to negotiate a dismissal of most of the charges. He ended up being sentenced to 25 to 39 months. Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases.
Assault and Battery Defense in Wilmington
At Roberts Law Group, we are prepared to defend against every type of violent charge, including:
- Assault and battery
- Aggravated assault
- Domestic violence
- Vehicular homicide and vehicular assault from DWI
- Homicide, including murder and manslaughter
- Armed robbery
In Wilmington, Raleigh and throughout North Carolina, we are ready to use our experience to try to help you get the best possible outcome for your criminal charges. Talk with us as soon as possible to learn more about your rights and your options.
According to statute § 14-33, regarding assault inflicting serious injury in North Carolina, the crime is a Class A1 misdemeanor that can carry significant criminal penalties. Learn more about the burden of proof that prosecutors have when pursuing convictions at trial.
North Carolina Murder and Violent Crimes Attorney
If you are under investigation or you are facing charges of assault and battery or another violent crime, contact the Roberts Law Group in Raleigh. Schedule a free initial consultation with us by calling our firm toll free at 866-630-2389 to make an appointment.
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
