DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
Raleigh Income and Business Tax Fraud Defense Attorney
Tax fraud allegations are serious. Not only are you facing jail time, fines and life-long probation, claims that you have committed tax fraud damage your professional and personal reputation. Tackling tough cases is not a job for every criminal defense lawyer. The lead attorney at Roberts Law Firm, PLLC, has years of experience to assist in your tax fraud defense.
Contact lawyer Patrick Roberts at Roberts Law Group, PLLC. As a former district attorney in three North Carolina counties, attorney Patrick Roberts knows how to challenge prosecutor's arguments successfully. The IRS and the North Carolina Department of Revenue will bring serious allegations when they believe that you engaged in tax fraud, but your case is not hopeless. There are ways to challenge a tax-fraud charge.
Let a Former Prosecutor Work for You
In difficult economic times, you need to make tough choices. We understand that people who commit tax fraud are not bad people. We will listen to your story to understand your situation. We handle your tax fraud defense in state or federal court in a way that protects your future the best we can. Whether you failed to report your taxes or you are accused of employee tax fraud, a dedicated attorney will help you understand what you are up against and your rights.
It is often you will learn that you are under suspicion of tax fraud through an investigation by the IRS or the North Carolina Department of Revenue. When you are being investigated for tax fraud, you need an attorney. We handle tax fraud investigations so that we can protect your rights from the outset. Incriminating statements made during the investigation can damage your defense. Before it comes to that, let us work for you.
An Experienced Attorney Will Inform You of Your Rights
We will represent you if you are accused or under investigation for tax fraud, including:
- Sales tax fraud
- Failure to report taxes or file a return
- Filing a false return
- Not accounting for an offshore account
Let an experienced criminal defense lawyer attack the prosecution's theory of tax fraud. With years of experience lawyer Patrick Roberts will work aggressively and quickly to allow you to move on with your life. Contact Roberts Law Firm, PLLC, today. We defend against other fraud crimes such as mail fraud, welfare fraud, and identity theft.
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
