DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
White Collar Theft Crimes Attorneys in Durham
It can be difficult to appreciate how serious charges of white collar theft are and how complex they can be for lawyers to investigate. Fraud, embezzlement and other white collar theft crimes often involve complex financial details and documents that are not easy to understand without in-depth experience and legal knowledge. Do not risk your freedom on an attorney who may not be able to grasp the full scope of your case.
At the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, we have handled the defense for a number of felony and misdemeanor white collar crimes in North Carolina. Former Assistant District Attorney Patrick Roberts has the experience and legal knowledge to build a strong defense and help protect your rights during the criminal process. Don't take chances with your defense. Learn more information about our white collar theft defense practice.
U.S. vs. J.R. - Our client was convicted of nine counts of mail fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Result: At the sentencing, the judge granted our motion for a downward departure and sentenced our client to one year and one day instead of the proposed three years in prison. Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases.
North Carolina Embezzlement and Fraud Defense
The Roberts Law Group provides representation for white collar crimes such as:
- Embezzlement
- Identity theft
- Forgery
- Tax and welfare fraud
- Medicaid and Medicare fraud
- Mail and wire fraud
- Stolen credit cards
Our firm is able to defend felony and misdemeanor white collar crimes in Durham and throughout the state of North Carolina. We have achieved many successful results and are ready to put our experience to work in your case.
For more information, look at the statutes for white collar crimes, including embezzlement (§ 14-90), counterfeiting (§ 14-13) and others. These statutes outline potential penalties and the burden of proof that prosecutors must meet when pursuing convictions.
Learn More About Your Rights to Representation
Learn more about white collar crimes and your options for experienced defense. Contact the Roberts Law Group in Raleigh and talk with us about your rights. Schedule a free initial consultation with us by calling our firm toll free at 866-630-2389 to make an appointment.
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
