DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
White Collar Crimes Defense in Goldsboro
Attorney Patrick Roberts is a former Assistant District Attorney who handled cases in three North Carolina counties. Now, as a criminal defense attorney, he handles a wide range of felony and misdemeanor crimes, including white collar theft crimes of embezzlement and fraud. These crimes carry significant penalties that include fines, probation, prison time and a permanent mark on your criminal record.
At the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, we provide defense for all state and federal white collar theft crimes. We recognize that these are often difficult and complex cases that have the potential to severely damage the reputations and freedoms of our clients. Our firm has helped many clients find successful outcomes in their cases, including the reduction and dismissal of criminal charges.
U.S. vs. J.R. - Our client was convicted of nine counts of mail fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Result: At the sentencing, the judge granted our motion for a downward departure and sentenced our client to one year and one day instead of the proposed three years in prison. Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases.
North Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyer
The Roberts Law Group provides representation for felony and misdemeanor white collar theft and other crimes, such as:
- Embezzlement
- Identity theft
- Forgery
- Tax and welfare fraud
- Medicaid and Medicare fraud
- Mail and wire fraud
- Stolen credit cards
Experience counts, and at the Roberts Law Group, we have the results to back up what we say. Even if you have not been arrested and are only under investigation, it is important to talk with an attorney now.
Statutes for crimes such as embezzlement (§ 14-90), counterfeiting (§ 14-13) and other white collar crimes outline potential penalties and the burden of proof that prosecutors must meet when pursuing convictions. Learn more information at the Roberts Law Group.
Embezzlement and Fraud Representation
Learn more about white collar crimes and your options from an experienced defense lawyer. Contact the Roberts Law Group in Raleigh. Schedule a free initial consultation with us by calling our firm toll free at 866-630-2389 to make an appointment.
We also deal with issues involving:
- Military Law
- Court Martial
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
