DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
Greenville Federal White Collar Crimes Defense
Crimes that are considered "white collar crimes," such as fraud, embezzlement and identity theft, are serious offenses that can carry lengthy prison sentences and other criminal penalties. Any criminal conviction will negatively impact your ability to get a job and to take advantage of other opportunities in the future. If you have been arrested for a white collar theft crime, it is important to speak with a lawyer as soon as possible.
At the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, we provide experienced criminal defense for white collar theft crimes in Greenville and throughout the state of North Carolina. Attorney Patrick Roberts has the experience and legal knowledge to build a strong defense for your charges. We know what you are facing, what is at stake, and what steps should be taken to best protect your rights.
U.S. vs. J.R. - Our client was convicted of nine counts of mail fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Result: At the sentencing, the judge granted our motion for a downward departure and sentenced our client to one year and one day instead of the proposed three years in prison. Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases.
A Criminal Defense Lawyer You Can Trust
The Roberts Law Group represents people facing all types of felony and misdemeanor white collar crimes, such as:
- Embezzlement
- Identity theft
- Forgery
- Tax and welfare fraud
- Medicaid and Medicare fraud
- Mail and wire fraud
- Stolen credit cards
Criminal investigations for white collar crimes often involve lengthy paper trails and complex financial details. The evidence in white collar cases is often very difficult for less experienced lawyers to understand. Only a lawyer with the necessary experience and legal knowledge can properly review your case and defend you in a courtroom.
For more information, look at the statutes for white collar crimes, including embezzlement (§ 14-90), counterfeiting (§ 14-13) and others. These statutes outline potential penalties and the burden of proof that prosecutors must meet when pursuing convictions.
North Carolina White Collar Theft Attorney
Learn more about white collar crimes and what rights you have under the law. Contact the Roberts Law Group in Raleigh. Schedule a free initial consultation with us by calling our firm toll free at 866-630-2389 to make an appointment.
Maryland vs. R.A.
Charge:
1st Degree Murder, Attempted 1st Degree Murder, 2nd Degree Murder Attempted 2nd Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Second Degree Assault and Felony Handgun Charges
Facing:
Multiple Life Sentences
Result:
Not Guilty
This client allegedly fired shots into a New Years Eve party on January 1st 2006. The shooting resulted in the death of a 21 year old female (who was survived by her twin sister), and the wounding of the deceased's uncle.
Defense focused on:
- The week-long unexplained absence of an important Government witness after the shooting occurred;
- The lack of any witnesses testimony as to the Defendant firing a handgun;
- The inability of the State to produce a weapon;
- And the possibility of another shooter on the scene due to blood splatter evidence outside the home near the spot that the Defendant was standing.
Defendant was found not guilty on the murder charges. The jury was hung as to the manslaughter, assault and handgun charges. The defendant later pled to manslaughter and was given a ten year sentence, suspend all but 5 years.
Maryland vs. E.W.
Charge:
Domestic Violence -2nd Degree Assault (Two Counts), Deadly Weapon with Intent to Injure, Malicious Destruction of Property, and 4th Degree Burglary
Facing:
26 years, 60 days years
Result:
Dismissed
In a case of alleged domestic violence, cross examination of accuser, the government's main witness, cast doubt on the strength of the Government's case. The Judge granted the Defense motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and dismissed all charges.
Maryland vs. M.W.
Charge:
Attempted Distribution of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Two Counts), Drug Possession
Facing:
44 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
Two officers testified at this jury trial. Inconsistencies elicited on the cross examination of the officers established that the Government did not do enough to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
