DISCLAIMER: These testimonials represent a small sampling of clients the firm has helped. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.
Cumberland County Internet Child Pornography Charges
The possession or distribution of Internet child pornography is a serious crime that carries serious criminal penalties and the social stigma of lifetime registration as a sex offender. In many cases, charges originate from Internet porn stings performed by law enforcement agencies. Many suspects do not even know of an investigation against them until the police show up to seize their computers.
At the Roberts Law Group, PLLC, based in Raleigh and serving clients across North Carolina, we take an aggressive approach to defend clients who are facing child pornography charges. We understand what is at stake in such a case and will help protect your rights during the entire criminal justice process. These cases demand experienced defense from a lawyer who knows how to protect your rights.
We also represent clients charged with the sexual exploitation of a minor, solicitation of a minor and other state and federal Internet sex crime charges.
North Carolina vs. M.D.
Charges:
Cyberstalking (7 Counts)
Facing:
Up to 7 months
Result:
Dismissed.
Our client was accused of repeatedly sending harassing e-mails to numerous co-workers over a period of several months. We argued that the e-mails did not rise to the level of harassment and that the purpose and intent of the e-mails had been misunderstood. The state chose to dismiss all charges.
Read more about our Proven Results in Difficult Cases
Possession and Distribution of Internet Child Pornography
Internet child pornography can include e-mails, websites, pictures, videos and other media that depicts child sexually abusive activity. Both the possession and distribution of child pornography are illegal acts, as is participating in the creation of child pornography.
Given the extensive evidence that is generally involved in these cases, and the harsh penalties that can result from a conviction, our firm will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your case and prepare the most effective defense for your situation.
Potential penalties upon a conviction for a charge of the possession of Internet child pornography can range from 44-228 months in prison for a North Carolina state offense (§ 14-190.16) and 5 years to life in prison for a federal offense ( § 2252A). They can also include lifetime registration as a sex offender.
Talk With an Attorney About Your Rights
If you have been arrested in Fayetteville or elsewhere in the state of North Carolina on Internet child pornography charges, contact an attorney at the Roberts Law Group. Schedule a free initial consultation by calling our Raleigh office toll free at 866-630-2389.
We also deal with issues involving:
- Military Law
- Court Martial
Maryland vs. J.N.
Charge:
4th Degree Sex Offense, 2nd Degree Assault
Facing:
11 years
Result:
Jury Trial - Not Guilty
This client was charged with the improper touching and assault of his ex-girlfriend's daughter. Cross examination and the defense witness testimony revealed that the accuser had been influenced by her mother to testify to events that never occurred.
North Carolina vs. O.S.
Charge:
First Degree Forcible Rape and First Degree Kidnapping
Facing:
26 - 33 years in prison
Result:
Dismissed
Case involved allegations of forcible rape at gun point. We were able to gather evidence to attack the accuser's credibility and discredit her story. The prosecution dismissed the charges.
State vs. D.P.
Result:
The prosecution dismissed the charges
Our client was charged with sexually assaulting an intoxicated acquaintance at a party. We gathered information to prove that those allegations were false.
North Carolina v. J.S.
Charge:
Assault On Female
Facing:
60 days in jail
Result:
Not Guilty at Jury Trial
Defendant had lost his trial in district court after having been accused of assaulting his wife. After an altercation, defendant's wife fell to the ground and broke her arm. The jury reviewed the facts and found defendant not guilty after carefully reviewing the Court's self defense jury instructions.
