State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
SNAP benefits are an important source of revenue for many retail businesses, including gas stations, convenience stores and specialty grocery stores. These federal food stamp benefits are a type of public assistance administered through the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program provides benefits for low-income households to buy certain eligible food items. SNAP recipients receive an EBT (electronic benefits transfer) card, which they may use to make eligible purchases.
Businesses that are authorized to accept SNAP benefits must comply with detailed rules and regulations. One of the most common violations – food stamp trafficking – occurs when:
Often, store owners aren’t aware of this activity, but they can nonetheless be held accountable. The consequences for such violations can affect the entire business.
There are three main penalties for SNAP violations enforced by the USDA:
The applicable penalty depends on the type of violation and the number of previous violations. The first intentional program violation (IPV) typically results in a 12- or 24-month suspension from the program, meaning retailers are unable to accept SNAP benefits during that period of time. However, if the violation involved accepting a transfer of public benefits in exchange for alcohol or weapons, the disqualification will likely be permanent. Repeat violations can result in double the suspension time or permanent disqualification.
These penalties revolve around your ability to do business and keep the doors open. Both permanent and temporary disqualification will impact your store’s revenue, while a civil fine for a single violation may reach well into the thousands of dollars.
Criminal charges are also a possibility in cases involving intentional violations on a large scale. A conviction can lead to a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and steep criminal fines. In addition, in cases where program benefits are used to purchase controlled substances, serious drug trafficking charges may be tacked on.
Read on for more information about the three most common types of penalties.
In general, the most damaging civil penalty for SNAP violations is permanent disqualification. Many retailers depend on EBT customers as a significant source of revenue. The inability to accept EBT transactions can put you at a significant disadvantage compared to your competitors. Some retailers even go out of business following permanent disqualification.
Under the Code of Federal Regulations (7 C.F.R. § 278.6), the Food and Nutrition Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture has the authority to disqualify any retailer from participation in EBT transactions, based on the retailer’s failure to comply with the Food Stamp Act of 1977.
The following are examples of activities that could lead to permanent disqualification – even if you didn’t know about it:
Temporary disqualification can also be extremely damaging to your business, depending on your cash position and the length of the disqualification. Under the Code of Federal Regulations, temporary disqualification can last anywhere from six months to five years. The length of time will depend on the type of violation, the weight of the USDA’s evidence against you and the number of prior SNAP violations.
A civil fine is known as a “civil money penalty” under the Code of Federal Regulations, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Agriculture to enforce the law against food stamp trafficking.
The actual amount of the civil fine depends on how much business your store does in EBT transactions as well as the number and type of SNAP violations alleged against you by the USDA.
Important: If there is any good news here, it’s that the USDA’s authority to issue a civil fine – instead of disqualification – means you could preserve your future EBT revenue. This outcome depends on whether or not your business had the proper compliance program in effect.
By taking proactive steps to properly train your employees and put a compliance program into place, you can help prevent violations in the first place and protect your business should a violation occur.
If you’ve received a charge letter from the USDA, or are under investigation for possible SNAP violations, or have recently been contacted by law enforcement in regard to your EBT transactions, contact Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. Based in North Carolina, we help owners of gas stations, convenience stores, and specialty grocery stores anywhere in the country.
Because SNAP violations involve federal law, we can help you no matter where you are in the United States. Our SNAP defense practice spans the nation.
Our lawyers understand the maze of regulations that govern public benefits under the SNAP program. We will fight for the best possible outcome in your situation. We can also help put proactive compliance measures into place to protect your business down the road.
State v. B.S.: Not Guilty Verdict in First Degree Murder Case.
In this case, our client was charged with First Degree Murder in connection with a “drive by” shooting that occurred in Charlotte, NC. The State’s evidence included GPS ankle monitoring data linking our client was at the scene of the crime and evidence that our client confessed to an inmate while in jail. Nonetheless, we convinced a jury to unanimously find our client Not Guilty. He was released from jail the same day.
State v. S.G.: First Degree Murder Charge Dismissed.
Our client was charged with First Degree for the shooting death related to an alleged breaking and entering. The State’s evidence included a co-defendant alleging that our client was the shooter. After conducting a thorough investigation with the use of a private investigator, we persuaded the State to dismiss entirely the case against our client.
State v. B.D.: First Degree Murder Charged Dismissed.
After conducting an investigation and communicating with prosecutor about the facts and circumstances indicating that our client acted in self-defense, the case was dismissed and deemed a justifiable homicide.
State v. I.R.: Reduction from First Degree Murder to Involuntary Manslaughter and Concealment of Death.
Our client was charged with the First Degree Murder of a young lady by drug overdose. After investigating the decedent’s background and hiring a preeminent expert toxicologist to fight the State’s theory of death, we were able to negotiate this case down from Life in prison to 5 years in prison, with credit for time served.
State v. J.G.:
Our client was charged with First Degree Murder related to a “drug deal gone bad.” After engaging the services of a private investigator and noting issues with the State’s case, we were able to negotiate a plea for our client that avoided a Life sentence and required him to serve only 12 years.
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
State v. B.S. – First Degree Murder
State v. E.D. – Identity Theft
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. We work hard to assess each case individually. Prior results do not guarantee any future outcome.
Fields marked with an * are required
Call 919-838-6643 to schedule a free initial consultation. Offices open weekdays 8am – 7pm, Saturdays 9am – 5pm
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
© 2023 Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. All Rights Reserved.