State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Federal criminal charges mean one thing. “It” has hit the fan.
Like all federal crimes, federal drug charges come with serious consequences, which can include crushing fines and a lengthy prison sentence upon conviction. This is in addition to the collateral consequences of having a felony conviction on your record, something that will limit the opportunities available to you for the rest of your life.
The action you take now can literally affect the rest of your life, for better or worse. Hiring the right criminal defense firm – a firm with a proven ability to succeed in federal court – can make all the difference when it comes to limiting your exposure to the harsh criminal penalties prescribed by federal statutes and sentencing guidelines.
Federal criminal charges are a whole different ballgame than most state court proceedings, and require the help of an attorney familiar with the legal issues and processes at hand. There is no substitute for experience.
For the criminal defense representation you need in order to protect yourself and your loved ones, look no further than the skilled defense attorneys of Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC.
The founder of Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC, Attorney Patrick Roberts, is a former assistant district attorney who worked almost exclusively in the prosecution of felony drug charges for part of his tenure as a prosecutor. Since founding the firm, Patrick Roberts has put this experience to use defending those accused of state and federal crimes and has built a firm dedicated to one thing: effective criminal defense. Kevin Marcilliat, a partner at the firm, has spent nearly the entirety of his career solely defending criminal cases, including federal drug prosecutions. You can put this valuable perspective on your side and have the peace of mind that comes with having an attorney prepare you for what to expect throughout the federal criminal defense process.
Generally, federal drug cases come with more significant sentences. Federal drug charges often involve larger quantities of drugs than state court prosecutions, resulting in charges that can trigger mandatory minimum prison sentences upon conviction.
At Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC, we have successfully defended people charged with conspiracy, possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and other federal drug crimes in federal courts including the Eastern, Western and Middle Districts of North Carolina. This includes defending people against charges of possession of a firearm in connection with a federal drug crime (commonly referred to as a “924(c)” charge)-this is a charge that, upon conviction, usually results in an additional mandatory 5 year sentence on top of the sentence for the underlying drug crime.
Some federal drug crimes come with mandatory minimum sentences if you are convicted in federal court, depending on the type and quantity of substance involved. There are certain “threshold” amounts of narcotics that trigger the applicability of these mandatory minimum sentences. Even if the Government has strong evidence that an individual possessed narcotics with intent to distribute, raising doubt as to the amount actually involved can be critical to a defense because such doubt can prevent applicability of these mandatory minimum sentences.
The attorneys at Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC‘s understanding of the prosecution’s case against you, combined with their rigorous advocacy and attention to detail, can help improve your chances of avoiding the harsh consequences of a federal drug conviction for crimes involving marijuana, methamphetamine, cocaine, opiates and other illegal substances.
Federal mandatory minimum sentences were popular at the time they were implemented. There was a perception that gang members, dope pushers and other “dregs of society” were getting off too easily as a result of “touchy feely” judges. The response was mandatory minimum sentences and a “war on drugs.” Unfortunately, having mandatory minimum sentences removes a judge’s discretion, resulting in some penalties that are harsher than the underlying facts of a case warrant.
At Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC we know the issues that come up in drug cases. Common issues are unreliable informants and challenges to illegally obtained evidence. Our attorneys will pursue all possible options for protecting you against the long prison sentences that can come with a federal drug crimes conviction. We know from experience that bad things can and do happen to good people, and that otherwise good people can find themselves facing mandatory minimum sentences as a result of one bad decision. Our goal is that the rest of your life is not defined by your current circumstances.
You can afford nothing less than a proven Raleigh criminal defense attorney when your rights, your freedom, your reputation and your future are on the line. You need a defense attorney with extensive experience in federal courts and a strong advocate who understands what the stakes are for you. In Raleigh, that means turning to the proven criminal defense attorneys of Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC.
Give us every opportunity to mount an aggressive defense for you or your loved one as soon as possible. We will review your situation with you, cover your options, and begin working on a strong and effective defense for you. Call 919-838-6643 today for your case evaluation.
State v. B.S.: Not Guilty Verdict in First Degree Murder Case..
In this case, our client was charged with First Degree Murder in connection with a “drive by” shooting that occurred in Charlotte, NC. The State’s evidence included GPS ankle monitoring data linking our client was at the scene of the crime and evidence that our client confessed to an inmate while in jail. Nonetheless, we convinced a jury to unanimously find our client Not Guilty. He was released from jail the same day.
State v. S.G.: First Degree Murder Charge Dismissed..
Our client was charged with First Degree for the shooting death related to an alleged breaking and entering. The State’s evidence included a co-defendant alleging that our client was the shooter. After conducting a thorough investigation with the use of a private investigator, we persuaded the State to dismiss entirely the case against our client.
State v. B.D.: First Degree Murder Charged Dismissed..
After conducting an investigation and communicating with prosecutor about the facts and circumstances indicating that our client acted in self-defense, the case was dismissed and deemed a justifiable homicide.
State v. I.R.: Reduction from First Degree Murder to Involuntary Manslaughter and Concealment of Death..
Our client was charged with the First Degree Murder of a young lady by drug overdose. After investigating the decedent’s background and hiring a preeminent expert toxicologist to fight the State’s theory of death, we were able to negotiate this case down from Life in prison to 5 years in prison, with credit for time served.
State v. J.G.: .
Our client was charged with First Degree Murder related to a “drug deal gone bad.” After engaging the services of a private investigator and noting issues with the State’s case, we were able to negotiate a plea for our client that avoided a Life sentence and required him to serve only 12 years.
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
State v. B.S. – First Degree Murder
State v. E.D. – Identity Theft
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. We work hard to assess each case individually. Prior results do not guarantee any future outcome.
Put our team of criminal defense lawyers on your side today. You are one phone call or email away from getting your questions answered by an experienced defense attorney.
Call us at 877-270-5081 to set up a free consultation or send us an email.
Fields marked with an * are required
Call 877-270-5081 to schedule a free initial consultation. Offices open weekdays 8am – 7pm, Saturdays 9am – 5pm
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
© 2023 Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. All Rights Reserved.