DISMISSALS
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
We have handled over 5000 cases in the last 12 years.
Here are just a few examples of the results we’ve obtained…
Facing: 12-34 Months in Prison
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina vs. R.B. – Our client, who had separated from her husband but was not yet divorced, was accused of entering her husband’s car using a key still in her possession and “stealing” items that were arguably marital property for the benefit of the couple’s children. After successfully arguing to the prosecutor that the actions of our client were not illegal, the charges were dismissed.
Attorney: KMM
Facing: 132-374 Months in prison (up to 31 Years)
Result: Probation
North Carolina vs. D.A. – Our client was accused of embezzling over $57,000.00 from her employer over the course of several years. Despite the fact that she was facing up to 31 years in prison, we successfully negotiated a sentence of Supervised Probation.
Attorney: KMM
Facing: Revocation of Probation and Active Prison Sentence
Result: Probation Terminated Successfully
North Carolina vs. S.B. – Our client was on probation for Felony Breaking and Entering and faced the possibility of having his probation revoked after he moved from North Carolina to Louisiana for an incredible job opportunity, and his probation transfer was never processed. During a hearing in front of the same Superior Court judge that initially sentenced our client, we successfully argued that our client had complied with the Court’s orders to the best of his ability, and it was in everyone’s best interest that he be allowed to continue his new job in Louisiana. As a result of our efforts, our client’s probation was terminated early without any violations.
Attorney: KMM
Facing: 12-34 months
Result: No charges filed
State v. A.W. — Client was caught on video entering a locked tool shed and stealing numerous pieces of farm equipment from his neighbor. We were able to gather evidence that our client had a substance abuse problem, which lead to his actions. The owner of the property agreed not to proceed with filing a report against our client in exchange for full repayment of the stolen property and proof that our client completed a substance abuse treatment program.
Attorney: MJM
Facing: 40 years
Result: Deferred Prosecution
United States of America v. K.M. – Our client was accused of preparing fake documents to assist straw buyers in committing mortgage fraud in violation of federal law. We argued and successfully persuaded the Assistant United States Attorney to defer prosecution.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 24-68 months
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina v. M.R. – Our client was accused of stealing materials and supplies from the construction company he worked for. We challenged each charge and the Assistant District Attorney dismissed the case because of insufficient evidence.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 5 years
Result: Probation
United States of America v. R.F. – Our client was a public official who falsified paperwork to maintain eligibility for government benefits and was facing up to 5 years in prison. The Presentence Investigation Report stated the guideline imprisonment range was 60 months. We argued that prison time was not necessary in light of our client’s role in the community and her history of good behavior. The Judge sentenced our client to 3 years of probation.
Attorney: APR
Facing: Up to 20 years
Result: No charges filed
United States of America v. T.C. – Our client was accused of money laundering for her alleged involvement in her husband’s drug trafficking conspiracy. After taking over the case from a previous attorney, we conducted our own investigation and convinced the United States Attorney not to prosecute our client.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 198-284 months
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina v. H.G. – Our client was caught fleeing from the police and then identified by an eyewitness in a photo lineup. He was then charged with three counts of First Degree Burglary and one count of Felony Larceny. After analyzing our client’s phone records, we argued that the eyewitness was mistaken. The Assistant District Attorney agreed and dismissed the charges against our client.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 6 – 8
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina v. R.W. – Our client was charged with violating the terms of his probation while residing out of state. We were able to show that the alleged violations were the result of miscommunication between our client and his probation officers. The court granted our motion to dismiss the violation and terminated our client’s probation.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 48-64 months in jail
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina v. D.H. – After conducting an investigation, we were able to show that our client shared the same name with the individual who actually committed the offenses. In light of this, the State dropped the charges against our client.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 120 – 160 months
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina v. E.W.H. – Our client was accused of forging several thousand dollars worth of checks that she stole from a family friend. We argued that the friend authorized the payments and that the money was loaned to our client, who intended to pay the friend back. The prosecutor agreed and dismissed the charge once we provided documentation to support our client’s claim.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 32 – 42 months
Result: 45 days
North Carolina v. K.B. – Our client was accused of stealing clothing from a local department store and several hundred dollars worth of checks from a family friend. She was on misdemeanor probation for stealing jewelry from a family member a few months before. We were able to negotiate a reduction of the felonies to misdemeanors and our client served time for all charges concurrently.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 12 – 16 months in prison
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina vs. J.H. – Our client was accused of breaking into a neighbor’s home and stealing money with some of his friends. We gathered evidence to prove that the client was at home when the break-in occurred. After the prosecutor initially offered the client a felony plea, the charges were dismissed.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 6 – 8 months in prison
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina vs. V.J. – Police officers accused our client of conspiring to steal a vehicle from a dealership where he used to work. Our client’s accuser had already been arrested for committing the same crime. We were able to show the Assistant District Attorney that the charge lacked merit and the charge was dismissed after one week.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 6 – 8 months in prison
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina vs. J.T. – A warrant was issued for our client’s arrest because an ex-lover accused him of stealing her vehicle. The charge was dismissed by the District Attorney’s office and the warrant was never served.
Attorney: APR
North Carolina vs. G.S. – Our client was accused of fraudulently obtaining money from a staffing agency where he once worked years before. The charge was preventing our client from obtaining a prestigious position. We were able to show the District Attorney’s office that our client had changed his life for the better and the charge was dismissed.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 8 – 10 months in prison
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina vs. R.D. – Our client was accused of stealing jewelry from a neighboring business. He was also accused of threatening the alleged owner when confronted by her about the theft. Both charges were dismissed.
Attorney: APR
Facing: Three years in prison
Result: One year, One day
U.S. vs. J.R. – Our client was convicted of nine counts of mail fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. The government alleged that our client fraudulently obtained more than $115,000 from her former employer. At the sentencing hearing, the Judge granted our motion for a downward departure, sentencing our client to one year and one day. The government had asked the judge to sentence our client to several years.
Attorney: APR
Facing: 24 – 30 months in prison
Result: Dismissed
North Carolina vs. V.J. – Our client was accused of stealing the personal information of an ex-lover to open fraudulent accounts in his name. We argued that the charges were false and that the ex-lover acted out of spite. The State chose to dismiss the charge after investigating our claim.
Attorney: APR
Kevin Matthew is a very professional and knowledgeable lawyer. Due to his knowledge and persistence Kevin was able to research and identify key elements into providing a strong argument for my DUI case resulting in the dismissal of my DUI case and clearing me from any potential punishment from the state. I would highly recommend Kevin to any one in need of a successful and highly motivated lawyer.
Disclaimer: The listed cases are illustrative of the types of cases handled and do not represent the entire record of cases handled by the firm. The outcome of a particular case is based upon a variety of factors and cannot be predicated upon a lawyer’s or law firm’s past results. The penalties listed for each case are the maximum amount of time the client was facing, based upon the structured sentencing guidelines and taking into consideration each client’s criminal record at that time. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
State v. B.S. – First Degree Murder
State v. E.D. – Identity Theft
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. We work hard to assess each case individually. Prior results do not guarantee any future outcome.
Put our team of criminal defense lawyers on your side today. You are one phone call or email away from getting your questions answered by an experienced defense attorney.
Call us at 919-838-6643to set up a free consultation or send us an email.
Fields marked with an * are required
Call 919-838-6643 to schedule a free initial consultation. Offices open weekdays 8am – 7pm, Saturdays 9am – 5pm
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
© 2023 Roberts Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy |